[99s-extend] Accept header in POST request
Loïc Hoguin
essen at ninenines.eu
Mon Feb 3 19:37:55 CET 2014
If Accept is sent and is different than text/html, yes.
This is how HTTP is defined. If the client says it speaks only
content-type X but you can only reply with content-type Y, you error out
early and stop processing the request. On the other hand if the client
doesn't say what content-type it speaks then the server can choose
whichever one it wants.
On 02/03/2014 07:26 PM, Łukasz Biedrycki wrote:
> My application sends both headers: “Content-type” and “Accept” header
> using POST method.
>
> For POST rest handler do I have to specify both: content_types_accepted
> and content_types_provided to manage this kind of request?
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Loïc Hoguin <essen at ninenines.eu
> <mailto:essen at ninenines.eu>> wrote:
>
> The content-type provided is relevant for any response, not just
> responses to GET requests. It defaults to text/html. If your client
> doesn't send that content-type, you have to define the callback.
>
> I notice that the documentation is incorrect about the relevant
> methods for this callback, I will open a ticket to fix it soon.
>
>
> On 02/03/2014 07:13 PM, Łukasz Biedrycki wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have a rest handler that accepts POST and PUT requests with
> “application/json” content type.
>
> I have content_types_accepted function defined as follows:
>
> content_types_accepted(Req, State) ->
>
>
> {[{‘application/json', from_json}], Req, State}.
>
>
>
> The problem I have is within a request that has two headers:
>
> *Content-type*: application/json
> *Accept*: application/json
>
> With this combination I receive *406*.
>
>
> You can repeat it with test:
>
> http_SUITE.erl:
> 1072 rest_postonly(Config) ->
> 1073 Client = ?config(client, Config),
> 1074 Headers = [
> 1075 {<<"content-type">>, <<"text/plain">>},
> 1076 {<<"accept">>, <<"text/plain">>}
> 1077 ],
> 1078 {ok, Client2} = cowboy_client:request(<<"POST"__>>,
> 1079 build_url("/postonly", Config), Headers, "12345",
> Client),
> 1080 {ok, 204, _, _} = cowboy_client:response(__Client2).
>
> My solution to that was to add a content_types_provided function:
>
>
> content_types_provided(Req, State) ->
>
>
> ContentTypes = [{{<<"application">>, <<"json">>, '*'}, to_json}],
>
>
> {ContentTypes, Req, State}.
>
>
>
> But it is useless as *to_json* callback registered is not called
> anyhow.
>
> Adding *content_types_provided* function is a correct solution
> in this case?
>
> Or I am missing something here?
> “Accept” header is not relevant only in case of GET requests?
>
> Thank for help,
> Łukasz Biedrycki
>
>
> _________________________________________________
> Extend mailing list
> Extend at lists.ninenines.eu <mailto:Extend at lists.ninenines.eu>
> https://lists.ninenines.eu/__listinfo/extend
> <https://lists.ninenines.eu/listinfo/extend>
>
>
> --
> Loïc Hoguin
> http://ninenines.eu
>
>
--
Loïc Hoguin
http://ninenines.eu
More information about the Extend
mailing list